Showing posts with label Jonah. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jonah. Show all posts

Thursday, December 19, 2024

Jonah in Acts 18

It's always enlightening reading the Bible in different languages. 

Last night at a German-language Bible study group we were going through Acts 18, and I read something I'd never noticed in English or Greek, which is that God says to Paul (who'd been having an awful time in Corinth), "ich habe ein großes Volk in dieser Stadt." - "I have a large people in this city."

English translations go with "many" because it works better, but the word groß (big) fits πολὺς (many) just fine, AND it made me think of Jonah and Jonah 4 in particular. 

Throughout Jonah the word גדול "big" comes up more than a dozen times, although the Greek word is μέγας (mega!).

But in the last line of Jonah we do get the word "many", speaking of the many animals who would have been destroyed, not to mention the 120k+, had Yhwh not had mercy on them. The "more than" is the adjectival form of πολὺς: πλείους. So we have "many" in the conclusion of Jonah, as in Acts 18:10.

All this makes clear what God is saying to Paul in Acts. Just as God had mercy on Nineveh through the unwilling Jonah, so too will he have mercy on the people of Corinth through the willing (if slightly battered) Paul.

It is a great city, with a great many people in peril with out God's salvation. 

Thursday, July 08, 2021

Jonah's Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Day

 Jonah 2 used to be one of my favourite passages in the Bible. For now, let's just say, it's complicated. If I was an editor, I would have told the author, "Lose either chapter 2 or chapter 4; you can't keep both." Chapter 2 makes Jonah pious; chapter 4 makes him sound racist. Chapter 2 makes him sound like he was converted in the belly of the fish; chapter 4 makes it sound as if the fish never happened.


Chapter 2 (in the Hebrew numbering, which is one ahead of the English) begins with the explanation, "And Yhwh provided a great fish, to swallow Jonah," and the chapter concludes, "And Yhwh spoke to the fish, and it vomited Jonah upon the dry ground." What happened in between? 2:1[1:17] continues, "Now Jonah was in the stomach of the fish, three days and three nights." Now, for me, as the editor, I would have again explained, "that's enough - less is more - I like it just as is." Chapter 2 would then read:

"And Yhwh provided a great fish, to swallow Jonah. Now Jonah was in the stomach of the fish, three days and three nights. And Yhwh spoke to the fish, and it vomited Jonah upon the dry ground."

Silence is golden, and the silence of the three days would speak to the reader: what happened those three days in darkness? Were those days informative? Was he just whingeing? Did he have an epiphany? Those questions would then be answered, first positively (Jonah did indeed preach in Nineveh, ch 3) but then negatively (he did not want them to repent, ch 4). Instead, by including the psalm of chapter 2, we are left trying to figure out what its point is, and how these words, which on the surface sound theologically sound, could come from the mouth of one who behaves so abominably in chapter 4.


Anyway, enough about the theology. What's going on in the structure?

There are a pair of bookends: 2:1[1:17] And Yhwh provided a great fish to swallow Jonah // 2:11[10] And Yhwh spoke to the fish and it vomited Jonah upon the dry ground.

In the body of the prayer, there is the narrator's introduction, and, possibly, at the end, his summary conclusion: 2:1c-2[1:17c-2:1] Now Jonah was in the stomach of the fish three days and three nights, and Jonah prayed to Yhwh his God from the stomach of the fish. // 2:10c[9c] Salvation comes from Yhwh. The reason I could include the end of v10[9] is because, contra the NIV, there is no introductory speech there, and it doesn't flow from v9[8]. But what it does do is mirror the introduction to the psalm, indicating that salvation is indeed from Yhwh, the right object of all our prayers.

The remainder of the psalm is divisible in two, with two subsections, each half concluding with "to your holy temple," (2:5[4], 8-10[7-9]), while the first parts theologically describe the experience of drowning (2:3-4[2-3]; 2:6-7[5-6]). The body of the psalm is then an ABAB structure.

What is not clear in English is the four times something is said to be at the very centre, albeit with three different Hebrew words, each referring, in different ways, to the bodily centre:

Now Jonah was in the stomach מעה
And Jonah prayed to Yhwh his God from the stomach of the fish מעה
From the belly of Sheol I called for help בטן
You hurled me [...] into the very heart of the seas לבב

He is not on the edge, on the cusp, but at the most inward part of the fish, of Sheol, of the seas. His view of his conundrum is that it is the worst it could possibly be.

Regardless of language, another thing which stands out is the manifold ways water is described:

  • the depths
  • the very heart of the sea
  • the swirling currents
  • waves and breakers sweeping over me
  • engulfing water
  • the deep
  • seaweed
  • roots of the mountains
  • bars of the earth

And that's not even mentioning the great sea creatures able to swallow and sustain human life for three days and three nights (do you remember this bloke who lasted almost 90 seconds in a whale's mouth?)! Now I'm not a particularly great swimmer (I've nearly drowned four times), but I still don't think I'm as hydrophobic as Jonah's prayer shows him to be. He really hates the stuff. 

Not least is because, as this prayer demonstrates, at the bottom of the sea lies the gateway to Sheol, the place of the dead. Whether you get sucked down a hole (cf Numbers 16) or down the bottom of the ocean, down below lies the "realm of the dead" (as per the NIV), a place no one wants to end up.


What I haven't discussed is what it all means. As one of my interlocutors on Twitter noted, "there isn't a line from him in that prayer that isn’t proved wrong elsewhere in text of Jonah." I think he's probably right.



Wednesday, October 08, 2008

Jonah and the story that got away

have you ever heard a sermon on Jonah and had someone say, 'put away your scepticism - it could really happen, in fact it did happen to a guy called James Bartley toward the end of the 19th century!'

well, even if you hadn't, i have, and i was thus very thankful for a link to this article by Edward B. Davis. it's a story of his endeavours to get the bottom of the true story so often quoted, but always referring back to an unknown source from the days before providing a bibliography was in vogue!


despite many lectures where i find it hard to concentrate, and feel like i'm just learning things for the sake of being able to regurgitate them come exam time, i've really been enjoying the Jonah lectures: even the power-point show is thoughtful, with some great artwork from the centuries (and yes, Jonah does lend itself to such representations, in contrast to the relative lack of artwork on the themes of Ephesians, for example, but that doesn't take away from the thoughtfulness of the lectures). there has been a constant integration of historical theology, pastoral theology, textual criticism (compare for example 2:5b between the MT and LXX for example - 2:4b in the English), literary style and genre. it's been really refreshing!


but do scroll through the article, it's a fascinating tale, and good to put to rest some shoddy work from many people in quoting with recklessness! i'm pretty sure, however, that people will continue quoting the story of Bartley and the whale for generations to come - why let the truth get in the way of a good story!

Thursday, September 27, 2007

wishing for mercy

1/ apologies for absence of posting

2/ what place is there for critiquing the theology of the Bible?
FOR, we get our theology FROM the Bible, so when it says something we don't like, at what point are we able to say, "no, that's not how God is," without

for example, Jonah:
now, i've always read Jonah 2 as a great poem, expressing noble truths about God's character.
UNTIL, that is, i heard it critiqued, saying that Jonah was an arrogant man, presuming upon God, he had NO right to pray as he did, to just ASSUME that God was gonnaget him out of the lurch.

3/ so then, what do we say when reading, for example Lamentations (c/f many Psalms), which wishes atrocities upon atrocities, upon their enemies and neighbours for their nonintervention?

i would like to say, "that's wrong, you should be wishing them mercy, just as you desire mercy from God," because this attitude isn't so much redeemed in Jesus as refuted.

indeed, neither does Paul agree with this view, in Romans 14:10-12;
Why do you pass judgment on your brother?
Or you, why do you despise your brother?
For we will all stand before the judgment seat of God;
for it is written,
As I live, says the Lord,
every knee shall bow to me,
and every tongue shall confess to God.
So then each of us will give an account of himself to God.


it all seems very log-in-the-eye to me.